Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 8200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 55% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 8200.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-55%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+55%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $350 for the Radeon Pro WX 8200, it costs 15% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 81.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+81.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) | ✅More affordable ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 8200 and GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 12,615 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 55%. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,615 | 19,548+55% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+17% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+41% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2460 MHz+64% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 224+133% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 3 MB+241% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 draws 230W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 115W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 73°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 170.0+210% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 14.6% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 81.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $299-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $299-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.0 | 65.4+82% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | AD107 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #210 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 8200 and GeForce RTX 4060
