Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 8200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $350 for the Radeon Pro WX 8200, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 23.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) | ✅More affordable ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 12,615 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,615+1% | 12,442 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS+40% | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1499 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+40% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 draws 230W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 55.6% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 130W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 95.7+75% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 and now averages $280. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT costs 20% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 44.4 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 23.3% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $500-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $280-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.0 | 44.4+23% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #210 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Radeon Pro 5700 XT
