Radeon Pro WX 9100
VS
Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 9100

2017Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

2018Core: 1316 MHzBoost: 1569 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 9100

#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
155%
#74
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095
136%
#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
127%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
127%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
125%
#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
121%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
120%
#80
Radeon Pro W6800X
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
115%
#81
Tesla T10
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975
113%
#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
111%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
109%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
108%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
105%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
100%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
98%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
97%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
96%
#90
Quadro P5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
91%
#91
RTX PRO 6000
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
90%
#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
88%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
88%
#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
79%
#96
L4
MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800
78%
#97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500
75%
#98
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000
75%
#99
Tesla M40
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099
73%
#100
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
68%
#101
65%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200 Max-Q

#1
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
43%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
41%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
38%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 9100Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P5200 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 9100 and Quadro P5200 Max-Q

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 9100

The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.

NVIDIA

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 12,250 and the Quadro P5200 Max-Q reaches 12,308 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1569 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 9100Quadro P5200 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
12,250
12,308
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Pascal
Process Node
14 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
4096+60%
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS+53%
8.033 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1569 MHz+5%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
256+60%
160
L1 Cache
1 MB+6%
0.94 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 9100Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 9100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) — the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 9100Quadro P5200 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 9100Quadro P5200 Max-Q
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 9100Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Encoder
VCE 4.0
NVENC 5.0
Decoder
UVD 7.0
PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 9100 draws 230W versus the Quadro P5200 Max-Q's 100W — a 78.8% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 9100Quadro P5200 Max-Q
TDP
230W
100W-57%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
53.3
123.1+131%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 9100Quadro P5200 Max-Q
MSRP
$2199
Avg Price (30d)
$550
Codename
Vega 10
GP104
Release
July 10 2017
February 21 2018
Ranking
#219
#217