Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Intel Arc Pro B50
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 9100
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B50
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The Intel Arc Pro B50 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro B50.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel Arc Pro B50 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $349 versus $550 for the Radeon Pro WX 9100, it costs 37% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 57.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+57.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) | ✅More affordable ($349) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 9100 and Intel Arc Pro B50
Radeon Pro WX 9100
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 12,250 and the Intel Arc Pro B50 reaches 12,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2600 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,250 | 12,208 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+100% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+15% | 10.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2600 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 256+100% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 draws 230W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 106.7% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 70W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.3 | 174.4+227% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 launched at $2199 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 36.5% less ($201 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.3 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 57% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2199 | $349-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $349-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3 | 35.0+57% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | July 10 2017 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #219 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 9100 and Intel Arc Pro B50
