
Radeon R3E vs Radeon R5 230

Radeon R3E
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 230
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 230
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R3E uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon R3E likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 230 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R3E is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 230.
| Insight | Radeon R3E | Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 230 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $49 for the Radeon R3E, it costs 49% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 93.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R3E | Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+93.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R3E and Radeon R5 230

Radeon R3E
The Radeon R3E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

Radeon R5 230
The Radeon R5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R3E scores 225 and the Radeon R5 230 reaches 222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R3E is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R5 230 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R3E) vs 384 (Radeon R5 230). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R3E) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 230). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R3E | Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 225+1% | 222 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS+59% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz+19% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R3E | Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R3E) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 230) — the Radeon R3E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R3E | Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R3E) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 230). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R3E | Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R3E) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon R5 230). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 2.2.
| Feature | Radeon R3E | Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | UVD 2.2 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 2.2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R3E draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 230's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R5 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R3E) vs 350W (Radeon R5 230). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R3E | Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5+2% | 4.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R3E launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon R5 230 launched at $50 and now averages $25. The Radeon R5 230 costs 49% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.6 (Radeon R3E) vs 8.9 (Radeon R5 230) — the Radeon R5 230 offers 93.5% better value. The Radeon R3E is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon R3E | Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $25-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.6 | 8.9+93% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Weston |
| Release | May 13 2019 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #757 | #873 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















