Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon R3E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon R3E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon R3E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 510M

2011

Why buy it

✅7.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon R3E

2019

Why buy it

✅Quadro NVS 510M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R3E is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro NVS 510M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro NVS 510M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5.8% in PassMark G3D (238 vs 225), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R3E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro NVS 510M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro NVS 510M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R3E has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon R3E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 510M

The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

Radeon R3E

The Radeon R3E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro NVS 510M scores 238 versus the Radeon R3E's 225 — the Quadro NVS 510M leads by 5.8%. The Quadro NVS 510M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R3E uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 512 (Radeon R3E). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R3E).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon R3E
G3D Mark Score	238+6%	225
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+80%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+50%	32
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon R3E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 510M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R3E carries 512 MB. Quadro NVS 510M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 510M and 64-bit on the Radeon R3E.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon R3E
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 510M draws 100W versus the Radeon R3E's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R3E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 350W (Radeon R3E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon R3E
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	2.4	4.5+88%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R3E (2019 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon R3E
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GF110	Polaris 23
Release	February 22 2011	May 13 2019
Ranking	#733	#757

Search Quadro NVS 510M on Amazon

Search Radeon R3E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.