Radeon R5 235 vs Radeon R5 310

AMD

Radeon R5 235

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 310

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R5 235 vs Radeon R5 310 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 235 vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 235 vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 235

2016

Why buy it

  • 4.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 235 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 235 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (336 vs 332), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R5 235 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 235 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $49 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.2% (6.9 vs 6.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R5 235 vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R5 235

The Radeon R5 235 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 336 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 235 scores 336 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 235 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 235) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R5 235Radeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score
336+1%
332
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
384+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6592 TFLOPS
0.7864 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock
1030 MHz
1024 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
20
24+20%
L1 Cache
80 KB
96 KB+20%
L2 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 235Radeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 235 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 310 carries 512 MB. Radeon R5 235 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 235 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310.

FeatureRadeon R5 235Radeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 235 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R5 235 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 235) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R5 235Radeon R5 310
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
11.2+70%
6.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 235 came in at $49, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.9 (Radeon R5 235) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 235 offers 1.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon R5 235Radeon R5 310
MSRP
$49
$49
Performance per Dollar
6.9+1%
6.8
Codename
Jet
Weston
Release
May 15 2016
April 18 2017
Ranking
#922
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.