
Radeon R5 235

Radeon R5 310
Radeon R5 235 vs Radeon R5 310 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R5 235 vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R5 235 vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R5 235
2016Why buy it
- ✅4.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R5 310
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 235 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 235 vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 235
The Radeon R5 235 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 336 points.

Radeon R5 310
The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 235 scores 336 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 235 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 235) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 235 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 336+1% | 332 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 384+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6592 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 20 | 24+20% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 96 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 235 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 235 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 310 carries 512 MB. Radeon R5 235 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 235 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310.
| Feature | Radeon R5 235 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 235 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R5 235 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 235) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R5 235 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2+70% | 6.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R5 235 came in at $49, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.9 (Radeon R5 235) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 235 offers 1.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon R5 235 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.9+1% | 6.8 |
| Codename | Jet | Weston |
| Release | May 15 2016 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #922 | #873 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














