Radeon R5 M320 vs GeForce 9600 GT
Radeon R5 M320
Popular choices:
GeForce 9600 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M320 is positioned at rank 578 and the GeForce 9600 GT is on rank 578, so the GeForce 9600 GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M320
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9600 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R5 M320 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The Radeon R5 M320 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9600 GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 M320 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9600 GT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M320 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9600 GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9600 GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $150), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 646.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M320 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+646.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M320 and GeForce 9600 GT
Radeon R5 M320
The Radeon R5 M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 475 points.
GeForce 9600 GT
The GeForce 9600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 M320 scores 475 and the GeForce 9600 GT reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M320 is built on GCN while the GeForce 9600 GT uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R5 M320) vs 224 (GeForce 9600 GT).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 475 | 473 |
| Architecture | GCN | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+357% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 M320 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9600 GT has 1 GB. The GeForce 9600 GT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M320 draws 75W versus the GeForce 9600 GT's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M320) vs 350W (GeForce 9600 GT). Power connectors: Mobile vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Legacy |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.3+97% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 M320 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce 9600 GT launched at $149 and now averages $20. The GeForce 9600 GT costs 86.7% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Radeon R5 M320) vs 23.6 (GeForce 9600 GT) — the GeForce 9600 GT offers 637.5% better value. The Radeon R5 M320 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $20-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 23.6+638% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | June 9 2015 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #522 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 M320 and GeForce 9600 GT
