Radeon R5 M320 vs Radeon HD 5570
Radeon R5 M320
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 5570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M320 is positioned at rank 578 and the Radeon HD 5570 is on rank 201, so the Radeon HD 5570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M320
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R5 M320 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The Radeon R5 M320 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5570 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 5570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 M320.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $150), it costs 47% less, resulting in a 87.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+87.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M320 and Radeon HD 5570
Radeon R5 M320
The Radeon R5 M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 475 points.
Radeon HD 5570
The Radeon HD 5570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 476 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 M320 scores 475 and the Radeon HD 5570 reaches 476 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M320 is built on GCN while the Radeon HD 5570 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R5 M320) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5570).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 475 | 476 |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1600 ×2+56% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 M320 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5570 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 5570 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M320 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 5570's 294W — a 118.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M320) vs 250W (Radeon HD 5570). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-74% | 294W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.3+294% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 M320 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon HD 5570 launched at $80 and now averages $80. The Radeon HD 5570 costs 46.7% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Radeon R5 M320) vs 6.0 (Radeon HD 5570) — the Radeon HD 5570 offers 87.5% better value. The Radeon R5 M320 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $80-47% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $80-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 6.0+87% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Hemlock |
| Release | June 9 2015 | November 18 2009 |
| Ranking | #522 | #651 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 M320 and Radeon HD 5570
