Radeon R5 M320 vs Radeon R5 M240
Radeon R5 M320
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 M240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M320 is positioned at rank 578 and the Radeon R5 M240 is on rank 238, so the Radeon R5 M240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M320
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 M320 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 M240.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 M240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 M240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 397.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+397.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M320 and Radeon R5 M240
Radeon R5 M320
The Radeon R5 M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 475 points.
Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 M320 scores 475 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M320 is built on GCN while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R5 M320) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 475 | 473 |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+220% | 320 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M320 draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M320) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.3 | 15.8+151% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 M320 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R5 M240 launched at $100 and now averages $30. The Radeon R5 M240 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Radeon R5 M320) vs 15.8 (Radeon R5 M240) — the Radeon R5 M240 offers 393.8% better value. The Radeon R5 M320 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M320 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $100-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $30-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 15.8+394% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Oland |
| Release | June 9 2015 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #522 | #911 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 M320 and Radeon R5 M240
