
Radeon R5 M335 vs GeForce 8800 GTX

Radeon R5 M335
Popular choices:

GeForce 8800 GTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M335 is positioned at rank 547 and the GeForce 8800 GTX is on rank 698, so the Radeon R5 M335 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M335
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GTX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R5 M335 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2008). The Radeon R5 M335 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8800 GTX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8800 GTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 M335 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M335 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+433.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 M335 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 M335 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 23.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M335 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M335 and GeForce 8800 GTX

Radeon R5 M335
The Radeon R5 M335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 549 points.

GeForce 8800 GTX
The GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 M335 scores 549 and the GeForce 8800 GTX reaches 556 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M335 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 8800 GTX uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 M335) vs 224 (GeForce 8800 GTX).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M335 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 549 | 556+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 320+43% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M335 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 M335 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800 GTX has 768 MB. The Radeon R5 M335 offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M335 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+433% | 0.75 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M335 draws 75W versus the GeForce 8800 GTX's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M335 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M335) vs 350W (GeForce 8800 GTX). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M335 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.3+97% | 3.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 M335 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce 8800 GTX launched at $599 and now averages $50. The Radeon R5 M335 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.7 (Radeon R5 M335) vs 11.1 (GeForce 8800 GTX) — the Radeon R5 M335 offers 23.4% better value. The Radeon R5 M335 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M335 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-75% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.7+23% | 11.1 |
| Codename | Jet | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | May 15 2016 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #922 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















