Radeon R5 M335
VS
Radeon HD 3870

Radeon R5 M335 vs Radeon HD 3870

AMD

Radeon R5 M335

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3870

2012Core: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M335 is positioned at rank 547 and the Radeon HD 3870 is on rank 298, so the Radeon HD 3870 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M335

#536
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2966%
#538
2689%
#539
2682%
#543
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2439%
#544
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2422%
#546
100%
#547
Radeon R5 M335
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
100%
#548
99%
#549
99%
#550
99%
#551
99%
#552
Radeon R5 M255
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#553
Mobility Radeon HD 530v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#554
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
98%
#555
96%
#557
95%
#558
Radeon HD 8690A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#559
93%
#560
92%
#561
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3870

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2879%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2765%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2733%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2729%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2723%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2708%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2673%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2663%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2639%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2632%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2600%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2594%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2548%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2546%
#283
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
3175%
#298
Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $219|Avg: $15
100%
#299
Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#300
Radeon HD 6310
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
95%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
94%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
94%
#305
Radeon HD 4290
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
93%
#306
Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
90%
#308
Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
89%
#309
Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
89%
#311
Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
87%
#312
Radeon E6460
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
86%
#313
Radeon HD 6290
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 3870 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 M335 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R5 M335Radeon HD 3870
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 3870 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3870 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 168.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R5 M335Radeon HD 3870
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+168.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M335 and Radeon HD 3870

AMD

Radeon R5 M335

The Radeon R5 M335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 549 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3870

The Radeon HD 3870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 552 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 M335 scores 549 and the Radeon HD 3870 reaches 552 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M335 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 3870 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 M335) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3870). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M335) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3870).

FeatureRadeon R5 M335Radeon HD 3870
G3D Mark Score
549
552
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
1280+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6592 TFLOPS
2.56 TFLOPS+288%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
20
80+300%
L1 Cache
80 KB
320 KB+300%
L2 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 M335Radeon HD 3870
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 M335 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3870 has 1 GB. The Radeon R5 M335 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 M335) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3870) — the Radeon HD 3870 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 M335Radeon HD 3870
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+300%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 M335 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 3870's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R5 M335 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M335) vs 300W (Radeon HD 3870). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon R5 M335Radeon HD 3870
TDP
75W-63%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Mobile
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
7.3+161%
2.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 M335 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 3870 launched at $219 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 3870 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.7 (Radeon R5 M335) vs 36.8 (Radeon HD 3870) — the Radeon HD 3870 offers 168.6% better value. The Radeon R5 M335 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon R5 M335Radeon HD 3870
MSRP
$150-32%
$219
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$15-63%
Performance per Dollar
13.7
36.8+169%
Codename
Jet
Pitcairn
Release
May 15 2016
March 5 2012
Ranking
#922
#460