Radeon R5 M335
VS
Radeon R7 M265

Radeon R5 M335 vs Radeon R7 M265

AMD

Radeon R5 M335

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M265

2014Boost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M335 is positioned at rank 547 and the Radeon R7 M265 is on rank 249, so the Radeon R7 M265 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M335

#536
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2966%
#538
2689%
#539
2682%
#543
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2439%
#544
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2422%
#546
100%
#547
Radeon R5 M335
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
100%
#548
99%
#549
99%
#550
99%
#551
99%
#552
Radeon R5 M255
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#553
Mobility Radeon HD 530v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#554
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
98%
#555
96%
#557
95%
#558
Radeon HD 8690A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#559
93%
#560
92%
#561
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M265

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1683%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1617%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1598%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1595%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1592%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1583%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1563%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1557%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1543%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1539%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1520%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1517%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1490%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1489%
#234
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1856%
#249
Radeon R7 M265
MSRP: $130|Avg: $30
100%
#250
Radeon HD 8250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#251
Radeon HD 3300
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
98%
#252
Radeon R5 220
MSRP: $35|Avg: $15
97%
#254
Radeon HD 7350
MSRP: $40|Avg: $10
96%
#255
GeForce GTX 285
MSRP: $359|Avg: $30
95%
#256
Radeon HD 7570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#257
Radeon HD 6380G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
93%
#258
Radeon HD 4550
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
93%
#259
RADEON HD7450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
92%
#260
GeForce GT 330
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
92%
#262
Radeon HD 7340G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
91%
#263
Radeon HD 8210E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
90%
#264
Radeon 535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 M265 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 M335.

InsightRadeon R5 M335Radeon R7 M265
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Leading raw performance (+2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M265 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M265 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 36% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R5 M335Radeon R7 M265
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+36%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M335 and Radeon R7 M265

AMD

Radeon R5 M335

The Radeon R5 M335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 549 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M265

The Radeon R7 M265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 560 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 M335 scores 549 and the Radeon R7 M265 reaches 560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M335 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M265 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 M335) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 M265). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M335) vs 1.894 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M265). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R5 M335Radeon R7 M265
G3D Mark Score
549
560+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
1024+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6592 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS+187%
Boost Clock
1030 MHz+11%
925 MHz
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
20
64+220%
L1 Cache
80 KB
256 KB+220%
L2 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 M335Radeon R7 M265
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 M335) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 M265) — the Radeon R7 M265 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 M335Radeon R7 M265
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 M335 draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 M265's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M335 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M335) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M265). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R5 M335Radeon R7 M265
TDP
75W-50%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
7.3+97%
3.7
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 M335 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R7 M265 launched at $130 and now averages $30. The Radeon R7 M265 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.7 (Radeon R5 M335) vs 18.7 (Radeon R7 M265) — the Radeon R7 M265 offers 36.5% better value. The Radeon R5 M335 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R5 M335Radeon R7 M265
MSRP
$150
$130-13%
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$30-25%
Performance per Dollar
13.7
18.7+36%
Codename
Jet
Pitcairn
Release
May 15 2016
February 13 2014
Ranking
#922
#489