Radeon R7 360 vs Radeon R9 260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 360 vs Radeon R9 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 360 vs Radeon R9 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 360

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 275W, a 195W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 260 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 260

2013

Why buy it

✅131.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
27.5% HIGHER MSRP
$139 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌243.8% higher power demand at 275W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 260 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 131.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 360 instead at 3,116 vs 3,048, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 360 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 360 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 30.4% (28.6 vs 21.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 260 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 360 vs Radeon R9 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 360

The Radeon R7 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,116 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon R9 260

The Radeon R9 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,048 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 360 scores 3,116 and the Radeon R9 260 reaches 3,048 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 360 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 360) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 260). Raw compute: 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 360) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 260).

Feature	Radeon R7 360	Radeon R9 260
G3D Mark Score	3,116+2%	3,048
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2560+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.613 TFLOPS	4.849 TFLOPS+201%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	48	160+233%
L1 Cache	192 KB	640 KB+233%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 360	Radeon R9 260
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 360 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 260. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 360) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 260) — the Radeon R9 260 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 360	Radeon R9 260
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 360 draws 80W versus the Radeon R9 260's 275W — a 109.9% difference. The Radeon R7 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 360) vs 450W (Radeon R9 260). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon R7 360	Radeon R9 260
TDP	80W-71%	275W
Recommended PSU	450W	450W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	165mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	39.0+251%	11.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 360 came in at $109, while the Radeon R9 260 launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 360 was 21.6% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.6 (Radeon R7 360) vs 21.9 (Radeon R9 260) — the Radeon R7 360 offers 30.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 360 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R7 360	Radeon R9 260
MSRP	$109-22%	$139
Performance per Dollar	28.6+31%	21.9
Codename	Tobago	Hawaii
Release	June 18 2015	November 5 2013
Ranking	#576	#316

Search Radeon R7 360 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.