
Radeon R7 360
Popular choices:

FirePro V7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V7000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 360.
| Insight | Radeon R7 360 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 360 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $100), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 181.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 360 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+181.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 360 and FirePro V7000

Radeon R7 360
The Radeon R7 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,116 points. Launch price was $109.

FirePro V7000
The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 360 scores 3,116 and the FirePro V7000 reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 360 is built on GCN 2.0 while the FirePro V7000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 360) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7000). Raw compute: 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 360) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000).
| Feature | Radeon R7 360 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,116 | 3,162+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.613 TFLOPS | 2.432 TFLOPS+51% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 360 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 360 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7000 has 4 GB. The FirePro V7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 360) vs 512 KB (FirePro V7000) — the FirePro V7000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 360 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 360) vs 12 (FirePro V7000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon R7 360 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 360) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro V7000). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon R7 360) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7000).
| Feature | Radeon R7 360 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 360 draws 80W versus the FirePro V7000's 150W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon R7 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 360) vs 350W (FirePro V7000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 360 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-47% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.0+85% | 21.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 360 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the FirePro V7000 launched at $899 and now averages $100. The Radeon R7 360 costs 65% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 89.0 (Radeon R7 360) vs 31.6 (FirePro V7000) — the Radeon R7 360 offers 181.6% better value. The Radeon R7 360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R7 360 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-88% | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-65% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+182% | 31.6 |
| Codename | Tobago | Pitcairn |
| Release | June 18 2015 | August 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #576 | #462 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















