Radeon R7 360 vs Tesla C2050

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 360 vs Tesla C2050 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 360 vs Tesla C2050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 360

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,390 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2149.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 238W, a 158W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla C2050

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2192.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌197.5% higher power demand at 238W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla C2050 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (3,176 vs 3,116), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 360 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 360 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,390 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2149.3% (28.6 vs 1.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla C2050 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 360 vs Tesla C2050 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 360

The Radeon R7 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,116 points. Launch price was $109.

Tesla C2050

The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 360 scores 3,116 and the Tesla C2050 reaches 3,176 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 360 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Tesla C2050 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 360) vs 448 (Tesla C2050). Raw compute: 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 360) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050).

Feature	Radeon R7 360	Tesla C2050
G3D Mark Score	3,116	3,176+2%
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	768+71%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.613 TFLOPS+57%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	48	56+17%
L1 Cache	192 KB	896 KB+367%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 360	Tesla C2050
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 360 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 360) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2050) — the Tesla C2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 360	Tesla C2050
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 360 draws 80W versus the Tesla C2050's 238W — a 99.4% difference. The Radeon R7 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 360) vs 350W (Tesla C2050). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 360	Tesla C2050
TDP	80W-66%	238W
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	39.0+193%	13.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 360 came in at $109, while the Tesla C2050 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Radeon R7 360 was 95.6% cheaper ($2390 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.6 (Radeon R7 360) vs 1.3 (Tesla C2050) — the Radeon R7 360 offers 2100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 360 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon R7 360	Tesla C2050
MSRP	$109-96%	$2499
Performance per Dollar	28.6+2100%	1.3
Codename	Tobago	GF100
Release	June 18 2015	July 25 2011
Ranking	#576	#569

Search Radeon R7 360 on Amazon

Search Tesla C2050 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.