
Radeon R7 260X

Radeon R7 360
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R7 360 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R7 360 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R7 360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 260X
2013Why buy it
- ✅28.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌27.5% HIGHER MSRP$139 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌43.8% higher power demand at 115W vs 80W.
Radeon R7 360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 115W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 170mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 260X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R7 360 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 260X
The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

Radeon R7 360
The Radeon R7 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,116 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 260X scores 3,198 and the Radeon R7 360 reaches 3,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R7 360 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 768 (Radeon R7 360). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 360). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,198+3% | 3,116 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+17% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS+22% | 1.613 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+17% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+17% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260X and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 360.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 104 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260X) vs 12 (Radeon R7 360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260X) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 360). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 260X) vs H.264 (Radeon R7 360).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 260X draws 115W versus the Radeon R7 360's 80W — a 35.9% difference. The Radeon R7 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R7 260X) vs 450W (Radeon R7 360). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 80W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 170mm | 165mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 27.8 | 39.0+40% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 260X came in at $139, while the Radeon R7 360 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon R7 360 was 21.6% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.0 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 28.6 (Radeon R7 360) — the Radeon R7 360 offers 24.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 360 (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139 | $109-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0 | 28.6+24% |
| Codename | Bonaire | Tobago |
| Release | October 8 2013 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #568 | #576 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














