Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R7 360

AMD

Radeon R7 260X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 360

2015Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R7 360 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R7 360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R7 360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 260X

2013

Why buy it

  • 28.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 27.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $139 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
  • 43.8% higher power demand at 115W vs 80W.

Radeon R7 360

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $30 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
  • Delivers 24.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
  • Draws 80W instead of 115W, a 35W reduction.
  • Measures 165mm instead of 170mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 260X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 260X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 28.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (3,198 vs 3,116), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 260X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 360 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 24.3% (28.6 vs 23.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 360 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 260X has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R7 360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 260X

The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

AMD

Radeon R7 360

The Radeon R7 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,116 points. Launch price was $109.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 260X scores 3,198 and the Radeon R7 360 reaches 3,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R7 360 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 768 (Radeon R7 360). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 360). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 260XRadeon R7 360
G3D Mark Score
3,198+3%
3,116
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896+17%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.971 TFLOPS+22%
1.613 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
56+17%
48
L1 Cache
224 KB+17%
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 260XRadeon R7 360
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260X and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 360.

FeatureRadeon R7 260XRadeon R7 360
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260X) vs 12 (Radeon R7 360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R7 260XRadeon R7 360
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260X) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 360). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 260X) vs H.264 (Radeon R7 360).

FeatureRadeon R7 260XRadeon R7 360
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 260X draws 115W versus the Radeon R7 360's 80W — a 35.9% difference. The Radeon R7 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R7 260X) vs 450W (Radeon R7 360). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon R7 260XRadeon R7 360
TDP
115W
80W-30%
Recommended PSU
500W
450W-10%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
170mm
165mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
27.8
39.0+40%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 260X came in at $139, while the Radeon R7 360 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon R7 360 was 21.6% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.0 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 28.6 (Radeon R7 360) — the Radeon R7 360 offers 24.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 360 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 260XRadeon R7 360
MSRP
$139
$109-22%
Performance per Dollar
23.0
28.6+24%
Codename
Bonaire
Tobago
Release
October 8 2013
June 18 2015
Ranking
#568
#576

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.