Radeon R7 260X vs Tesla C2050

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 260X vs Tesla C2050 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 260X vs Tesla C2050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 260X

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,360 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1710.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 115W instead of 238W, a 123W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla C2050

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1697.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
❌107% higher power demand at 238W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 260X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (3,198 vs 3,176), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 260X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,360 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1710.3% (23.0 vs 1.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 260X vs Tesla C2050 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 260X

The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

Tesla C2050

The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 260X scores 3,198 and the Tesla C2050 reaches 3,176 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Tesla C2050 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 448 (Tesla C2050). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050).

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Tesla C2050
G3D Mark Score	3,198	3,176
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+100%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.971 TFLOPS+92%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	56	56
L1 Cache	224 KB	896 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Tesla C2050
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260X and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 260X) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2050) — the Tesla C2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Tesla C2050
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 260X draws 115W versus the Tesla C2050's 238W — a 69.7% difference. The Radeon R7 260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R7 260X) vs 350W (Tesla C2050). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Tesla C2050
TDP	115W-52%	238W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	170mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	27.8+109%	13.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 260X came in at $139, while the Tesla C2050 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Radeon R7 260X was 94.4% cheaper ($2360 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.0 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1.3 (Tesla C2050) — the Radeon R7 260X offers 1669.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 260X (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Tesla C2050
MSRP	$139-94%	$2499
Performance per Dollar	23.0+1669%	1.3
Codename	Bonaire	GF100
Release	October 8 2013	July 25 2011
Ranking	#568	#569

Search Radeon R7 260X on Amazon

Search Tesla C2050 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.