Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R9 M470X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R9 M470X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R9 M470X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 260X

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $211 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 148.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M470X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M470X

2016

Why buy it

✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
151.8% HIGHER MSRP
$350 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M470X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (3,244 vs 3,198), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 260X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $211 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 148.2% (23.0 vs 9.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M470X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R9 M470X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 260X

The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

Radeon R9 M470X

The Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,244 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 260X scores 3,198 and the Radeon R9 M470X reaches 3,244 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M470X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M470X). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470X). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon R9 M470X
G3D Mark Score	3,198	3,244+1%
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.971 TFLOPS	1.971 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	1100 MHz+10%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	56	56
L1 Cache	224 KB	224 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon R9 M470X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M470X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M470X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260X and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M470X.

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon R9 M470X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	104 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 260X draws 115W versus the Radeon R9 M470X's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon R9 M470X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R7 260X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon R9 M470X
TDP	115W	75W-35%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Length	170mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	27.8	43.3+56%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 260X came in at $139, while the Radeon R9 M470X launched at $350. On MSRP, Radeon R7 260X was 60.3% cheaper ($211 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.0 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 9.3 (Radeon R9 M470X) — the Radeon R7 260X offers 147.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M470X (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP	$139-60%	$350
Performance per Dollar	23.0+147%	9.3
Codename	Bonaire	Emerald
Release	October 8 2013	May 15 2016
Ranking	#568	#563

Search Radeon R7 260X on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M470X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.