
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R9 M290X

Radeon R7 260X
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M290X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 260X.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M290X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M290X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $150), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 151.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+151.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 260X and Radeon R9 M290X

Radeon R7 260X
The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

Radeon R9 M290X
The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 260X scores 3,198 and the Radeon R9 M290X reaches 3,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,198 | 3,218 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1280+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS | 2.304 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+11% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 320 KB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 260X comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M290X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 260X) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Radeon R9 M290X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 104 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 260X draws 115W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 14% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R7 260X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 100W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 27.8 | 32.2+16% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 260X launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 M290X costs 60% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.3 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 53.6 (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Radeon R9 M290X offers 151.6% better value. The Radeon R9 M290X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139-65% | $400 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $60-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.3 | 53.6+152% |
| Codename | Bonaire | Neptune |
| Release | October 8 2013 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #568 | #566 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















