Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Radeon R7 260X
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 260X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 260X.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 260X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 195.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+195.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 260X and Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Radeon R7 260X
The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,245 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 260X scores 3,198 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H reaches 3,245 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2300 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,198 | 3,245+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1792+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+737% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2300 MHz+130% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 56 | 112+100% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 512 KB+129% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260X) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 104 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 260X draws 115W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H's 43W — a 91.1% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R7 260X) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 43W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 27.8 | 75.5+172% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 260X launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H launched at $450 and now averages $450. The Radeon R7 260X costs 66.7% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.3 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 7.2 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) — the Radeon R7 260X offers 195.8% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139-69% | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-67% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.3+196% | 7.2 |
| Codename | Bonaire | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #568 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 260X and Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
