
Radeon R7 260X

Tesla M10
Radeon R7 260X vs Tesla M10 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 260X vs Tesla M10 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon R7 260X vs Tesla M10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 260X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,361 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1712.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 225W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 267mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla M10
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1698.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ❌95.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 115W.
- ❌57.1% longer card at 267mm vs 170mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 260X vs Tesla M10 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 260X
The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

Tesla M10
The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 260X scores 3,198 and the Tesla M10 reaches 3,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Tesla M10 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 640 (Tesla M10). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,198 | 3,173 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+40% | 640 ×4 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS+18% | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1306 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×4 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 ×4 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 320 KB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260X and 64-bit on the Tesla M10. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260X) vs 2 MB (Tesla M10) — the Tesla M10 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260X) vs 12_1 (Tesla M10). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260X) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M10). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 5th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 260X draws 115W versus the Tesla M10's 225W — a 64.7% difference. The Radeon R7 260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R7 260X) vs 350W (Tesla M10). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-49% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 27.8+97% | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 260X came in at $139, while the Tesla M10 launched at $2500. On MSRP, Radeon R7 260X was 94.4% cheaper ($2361 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.0 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1.3 (Tesla M10) — the Radeon R7 260X offers 1669.2% better value. The newer card here is Tesla M10 (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139-94% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0+1669% | 1.3 |
| Codename | Bonaire | GM107 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #568 | #570 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














