GRID P4-2Q vs Radeon R7 260X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-2Q vs Radeon R7 260X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P4-2Q vs Radeon R7 260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
979.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,500 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
❌95.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 115W.

Radeon R7 260X

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,361 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 991.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 115W instead of 225W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 260X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (3,198 vs 3,162), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P4-2Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,361 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $1,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 991.4% (23.0 vs 2.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 260X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P4-2Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P4-2Q vs Radeon R7 260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P4-2Q

The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.

Radeon R7 260X

The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-2Q scores 3,162 and the Radeon R7 260X reaches 3,198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R7 260X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 896 (Radeon R7 260X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GRID P4-2Q	Radeon R7 260X
G3D Mark Score	3,162	3,198+1%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+129%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+145%	1.971 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+18%	1000 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+129%	56
L1 Cache	768 KB+243%	224 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P4-2Q	Radeon R7 260X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P4-2Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260X) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P4-2Q	Radeon R7 260X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 260X's 115W — a 64.7% difference. The Radeon R7 260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-2Q) vs 500W (Radeon R7 260X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID P4-2Q	Radeon R7 260X
TDP	225W	115W-49%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	14.1	27.8+97%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-2Q came in at $1500, while the Radeon R7 260X launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 260X was 90.7% cheaper ($1361 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 23.0 (Radeon R7 260X) — the Radeon R7 260X offers 995.2% better value. The newer card here is GRID P4-2Q (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P4-2Q	Radeon R7 260X
MSRP	$1500	$139-91%
Performance per Dollar	2.1	23.0+995%
Codename	GM204	Bonaire
Release	August 30 2015	October 8 2013
Ranking	#433	#568

Search GRID P4-2Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 260X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.