
GRID P4-2Q

Tesla K40m
GRID P4-2Q vs Tesla K40m Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P4-2Q vs Tesla K40m FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID P4-2Q vs Tesla K40m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P4-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla K40m
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P4-2Q vs Tesla K40m Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.

Tesla K40m
The Tesla K40m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,143 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-2Q scores 3,162 and the Tesla K40m reaches 3,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K40m uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40m). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40m). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,162 | 3,143 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2880+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 5.046 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+34% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+220% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P4-2Q and 64-bit on the Tesla K40m. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40m) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-2Q draws 225W versus the Tesla K40m's 245W — a 8.5% difference. The GRID P4-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-2Q) vs 350W (Tesla K40m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-8% | 245W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1+10% | 12.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GRID P4-2Q (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | GK110B |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 22 2013 |
| Ranking | #433 | #573 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














