GRID P4-2Q vs Tesla M10
GRID P4-2Q
Popular choices:
Tesla M10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P4-2Q is positioned at rank 285 and the Tesla M10 is on rank 334, so the GRID P4-2Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-2Q
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M10
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M10 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P4-2Q.
| Insight | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P4-2Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID P4-2Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $235 (vs $500), it costs 53% less, resulting in a 112% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+112%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($235) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-2Q and Tesla M10
GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.
Tesla M10
The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-2Q scores 3,162 and the Tesla M10 reaches 3,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla M10 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 640 (Tesla M10). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,162 | 3,173 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 ×4 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+189% | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1306 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 ×4 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 ×4 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+140% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-2Q draws 225W versus the Tesla M10's 225W — a 0% difference. The Tesla M10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-2Q) vs 350W (Tesla M10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1 | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-2Q launched at $1500 MSRP and currently averages $235, while the Tesla M10 launched at $2500 and now averages $500. The GRID P4-2Q costs 53% less ($265 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.5 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 6.3 (Tesla M10) — the GRID P4-2Q offers 114.3% better value. The Tesla M10 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500-40% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $235-53% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5+114% | 6.3 |
| Codename | GM204 | GM107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #433 | #570 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P4-2Q and Tesla M10
