GRID P4-2Q vs Tesla C2050

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-2Q vs Tesla C2050 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P4-2Q vs Tesla C2050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $999 less on MSRP ($1,500 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 65.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla C2050

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
66.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$1,500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla C2050 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (3,176 vs 3,162), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P4-2Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P4-2Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $999 cheaper on MSRP at $1,500 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 65.9% (2.1 vs 1.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla C2050 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P4-2Q vs Tesla C2050 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P4-2Q

The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.

Tesla C2050

The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-2Q scores 3,162 and the Tesla C2050 reaches 3,176 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla C2050 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 448 (Tesla C2050). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050).

Feature	GRID P4-2Q	Tesla C2050
G3D Mark Score	3,162	3,176
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+357%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+369%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	128+129%	56
L1 Cache	768 KB	896 KB+17%
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P4-2Q	Tesla C2050
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P4-2Q and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P4-2Q	Tesla C2050
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-2Q draws 225W versus the Tesla C2050's 238W — a 5.6% difference. The GRID P4-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-2Q) vs 350W (Tesla C2050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P4-2Q	Tesla C2050
TDP	225W-5%	238W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	14.1+6%	13.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-2Q came in at $1500, while the Tesla C2050 launched at $2499. On MSRP, GRID P4-2Q was 40% cheaper ($999 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1.3 (Tesla C2050) — the GRID P4-2Q offers 61.5% better value. The newer card here is GRID P4-2Q (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GRID P4-2Q	Tesla C2050
MSRP	$1500-40%	$2499
Performance per Dollar	2.1+62%	1.3
Codename	GM204	GF100
Release	August 30 2015	July 25 2011
Ranking	#433	#569

Search GRID P4-2Q on Amazon

Search Tesla C2050 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.