
GeForce 770M
Popular choices:

GRID P4-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce 770M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
GRID P4-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
GeForce 770M
2013GRID P4-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce 770M better than GRID P4-2Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GRID P4-2Q make more sense than GeForce 770M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce 770M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce 770M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce 770M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce 770M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 770M and GRID P4-2Q

GeForce 770M
GeForce 770M
The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.

GRID P4-2Q
GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 770M scores 3,246 and the GRID P4-2Q reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 770M is built on Kepler while the GRID P4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 770M) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce 770M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,246+3% | 3,162 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 | 2048+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.53 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+215% |
| Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 1178 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 768 KB+860% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 770M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P4-2Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 770M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GRID P4-2Q has 2 GB. The GRID P4-2Q offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce 770M) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 770M draws 75W versus the GRID P4-2Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 770M) vs 350W (GRID P4-2Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 43.3+207% | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 770M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1500 |
| Codename | GK106 | GM204 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #603 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













