GeForce 770M vs GRID P4-2Q

NVIDIA

GeForce 770M

2013Core: 811 MHzBoost: 797 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS

GRID P4-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
··

GeForce 770M vs GRID P4-2Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 770M vs GRID P4-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 770M

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).

GRID P4-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 770M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (3,246 vs 3,162), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 770M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P4-2Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P4-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 770M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 770M vs GRID P4-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 770M

The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.

NVIDIA

GRID P4-2Q

The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 770M scores 3,246 and the GRID P4-2Q reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 770M is built on Kepler while the GRID P4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 770M) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce 770M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
G3D Mark Score
3,246+3%
3,162
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960
2048+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.53 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+215%
Boost Clock
797 MHz
1178 MHz+48%
ROPs
24
64+167%
TMUs
80
128+60%
L1 Cache
80 KB
768 KB+860%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 770M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P4-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 770M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GRID P4-2Q carries 2 GB. GRID P4-2Q gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 770M and 64-bit on the GRID P4-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce 770M) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 770M draws 75W versus the GRID P4-2Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 770M) vs 350W (GRID P4-2Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
43.3+207%
14.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID P4-2Q (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
MSRP
$1500
Codename
GK106
GM204
Release
May 30 2013
August 30 2015
Ranking
#603
#433

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.