GeForce 770M vs GRID P4-2Q

NVIDIA

GeForce 770M

2013Core: 811 MHzBoost: 797 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

GRID P4-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce 770M

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).

GRID P4-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce 770M better than GRID P4-2Q?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,246 vs 3,162 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce 770M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (75W vs 225W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 770M is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce 770M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce 770M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $1,500 MSRP, and you are getting 2.7% higher G3D Mark. GRID P4-2Q really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does GRID P4-2Q make more sense than GeForce 770M?
Yes. GRID P4-2Q is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $1,500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce 770M. The trade-off is that GeForce 770M currently gives you 2.7% higher G3D Mark. GRID P4-2Q still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
1080p
low31 FPS103 FPS
medium20 FPS85 FPS
high14 FPS67 FPS
ultra8 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low24 FPS86 FPS
medium14 FPS72 FPS
high7 FPS51 FPS
ultra4 FPS29 FPS
4K
low9 FPS28 FPS
medium6 FPS26 FPS
high4 FPS17 FPS
ultra3 FPS15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
1080p
low39 FPS128 FPS
medium19 FPS101 FPS
high14 FPS82 FPS
ultra9 FPS63 FPS
1440p
low20 FPS88 FPS
medium9 FPS65 FPS
high7 FPS53 FPS
ultra5 FPS40 FPS
4K
low6 FPS41 FPS
medium3 FPS32 FPS
high3 FPS29 FPS
ultra2 FPS24 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
1080p
low146 FPS142 FPS
medium117 FPS114 FPS
high97 FPS95 FPS
ultra73 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low110 FPS107 FPS
medium88 FPS85 FPS
high73 FPS71 FPS
ultra55 FPS53 FPS
4K
low73 FPS71 FPS
medium58 FPS57 FPS
high49 FPS47 FPS
ultra37 FPS36 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
1080p
low60 FPS142 FPS
medium49 FPS114 FPS
high39 FPS95 FPS
ultra31 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low36 FPS107 FPS
medium30 FPS85 FPS
high26 FPS71 FPS
ultra20 FPS53 FPS
4K
low24 FPS71 FPS
medium18 FPS57 FPS
high15 FPS47 FPS
ultra11 FPS36 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 770M and GRID P4-2Q

NVIDIA

GeForce 770M

The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.

NVIDIA

GRID P4-2Q

The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 770M scores 3,246 and the GRID P4-2Q reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 770M is built on Kepler while the GRID P4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 770M) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce 770M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
G3D Mark Score
3,246+3%
3,162
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960
2048+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.53 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+215%
Boost Clock
797 MHz
1178 MHz+48%
ROPs
24
64+167%
TMUs
80
128+60%
L1 Cache
80 KB
768 KB+860%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 770M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P4-2Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 770M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GRID P4-2Q has 2 GB. The GRID P4-2Q offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce 770M) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 770M draws 75W versus the GRID P4-2Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 770M) vs 350W (GRID P4-2Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
43.3+207%
14.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P4-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 770MGRID P4-2Q
MSRP
$1500
Codename
GK106
GM204
Release
May 30 2013
August 30 2015
Ranking
#603
#433