
GRID P4-2Q vs Radeon R7 360

GRID P4-2Q
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P4-2Q is positioned at rank #285 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-2Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 360.
| Insight | GRID P4-2Q | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 360 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $235), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 561.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P4-2Q | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+561.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($235) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-2Q and Radeon R7 360

GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.

Radeon R7 360
The Radeon R7 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,116 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-2Q scores 3,162 and the Radeon R7 360 reaches 3,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R7 360 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 768 (Radeon R7 360). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 360). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,162+1% | 3,116 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+199% | 1.613 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+18% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+300% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 360) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 360's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Radeon R7 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-2Q) vs 450W (Radeon R7 360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 80W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1 | 39.0+177% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-2Q launched at $1500 MSRP and currently averages $235, while the Radeon R7 360 launched at $109 and now averages $35. The Radeon R7 360 costs 85.1% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.5 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 89.0 (Radeon R7 360) — the Radeon R7 360 offers 559.3% better value.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | $109-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $235 | $35-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5 | 89.0+559% |
| Codename | GM204 | Tobago |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #433 | #576 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















