CPU
GPU
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is positioned at rank 164 and the GeForce GT 750M is on rank 158, so the GeForce GT 750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).
| Insight | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 39.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+39.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and GeForce GT 750M
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,300 points.
GeForce GT 750M
The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) scores 1,300 and the GeForce GT 750M reaches 1,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is built on GCN while the GeForce GT 750M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 384 (GeForce GT 750M).
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,300 | 1,332+2% |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 750M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 12 (FL11) (GeForce GT 750M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL11) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GT 750M). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M).
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 750M's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 350W (GeForce GT 750M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 43.3+63% | 26.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.1 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 26.6 (GeForce GT 750M) — the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers 39.5% better value. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $173 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-30% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.1+39% | 26.6 |
| Codename | Kaveri Spectre | GK107 |
| Release | January 14 2014 | January 9 2013 |
| Ranking | #830 | #792 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and GeForce GT 750M
