Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs Radeon R7 A370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs Radeon R7 A370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs Radeon R7 A370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
16.1% HIGHER MSRP
$173 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R7 A370

2015

Why buy it

✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) instead at 1,300 vs 1,281, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $24 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $173, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 14.4% (8.6 vs 7.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs Radeon R7 A370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,300 points.

Radeon R7 A370

The Radeon R7 A370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) scores 1,300 and the Radeon R7 A370 reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is built on GCN while the Radeon R7 A370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A370).

Feature	Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	Radeon R7 A370
G3D Mark Score	1,300+1%	1,281
Architecture	GCN	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	1024+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	Radeon R7 A370
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A370.

Feature	Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	Radeon R7 A370
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 A370's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A370). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	Radeon R7 A370
TDP	30W-70%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	43.3+238%	12.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) came in at $173, while the Radeon R7 A370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A370 was 13.9% cheaper ($24 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.5 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 8.6 (Radeon R7 A370) — the Radeon R7 A370 offers 14.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A370 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	Radeon R7 A370
MSRP	$173	$149-14%
Performance per Dollar	7.5	8.6+15%
Codename	Kaveri Spectre	Trinidad
Release	January 14 2014	June 18 2015
Ranking	#830	#467

Search Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.