Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs Tesla M2070-Q
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Popular choices:
Tesla M2070-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is positioned at rank 164 and the Tesla M2070-Q is on rank 398, so the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M2070-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).
| Insight | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 42.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+42.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Tesla M2070-Q
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,300 points.
Tesla M2070-Q
The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) scores 1,300 and the Tesla M2070-Q reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is built on GCN while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q).
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,300 | 1,306 |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+14% | 448 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) draws 30W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-87% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 43.3+647% | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $173 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489 and now averages $50. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.1 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 26.1 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers 42.1% better value. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $173-97% | $5489 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-30% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.1+42% | 26.1 |
| Codename | Kaveri Spectre | GF100 |
| Release | January 14 2014 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #830 | #798 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Tesla M2070-Q
