Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs Radeon HD 6770
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is positioned at rank 164 and the Radeon HD 6770 is on rank 127, so the Radeon HD 6770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6770 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $129), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 277% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+277%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($129) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Radeon HD 6770
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,300 points.
Radeon HD 6770
The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) scores 1,300 and the Radeon HD 6770 reaches 1,271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is built on GCN while the Radeon HD 6770 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6770).
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,300+2% | 1,271 |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 800+56% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6770 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 6770 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6770). Vulkan: 1.1 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5+2% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs None (Radeon HD 6770). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6770).
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6770's 108W — a 113% difference. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6770). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-72% | 108W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 198mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 43.3+267% | 11.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $173 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon HD 6770 launched at $129 and now averages $129. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) costs 72.9% less ($94 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.1 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 9.9 (Radeon HD 6770) — the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers 274.7% better value. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $173 | $129-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-73% | $129 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.1+275% | 9.9 |
| Codename | Kaveri Spectre | Juniper |
| Release | January 14 2014 | January 21 2011 |
| Ranking | #830 | #807 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Radeon HD 6770
