
Radeon R7 +8G vs FirePro 3D V8700

Radeon R7 +8G
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V8700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 +8G is positioned at rank 217 and the FirePro 3D V8700 is on rank 365, so the Radeon R7 +8G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 +8G
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V8700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 +8G.
| Insight | Radeon R7 +8G | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 +8G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 +8G holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $1,229), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 5968.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 +8G | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5968.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,229) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 +8G and FirePro 3D V8700

Radeon R7 +8G
The Radeon R7 +8G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.

FirePro 3D V8700
The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 +8G scores 1,191 and the FirePro 3D V8700 reaches 1,206 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 +8G is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro 3D V8700 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700). Raw compute: 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700).
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,191 | 1,206+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.171 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+197% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 512 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 +8G comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB. The FirePro 3D V8700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8700) — the FirePro 3D V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1)+19% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8700). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8700).
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 +8G draws 30W versus the FirePro 3D V8700's 274W — a 160.5% difference. The Radeon R7 +8G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 254mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-89% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 254mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 39.7+802% | 4.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 +8G launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro 3D V8700 launched at $1499 and now averages $1229. The Radeon R7 +8G costs 98.4% less ($1209 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.5 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 1.0 (FirePro 3D V8700) — the Radeon R7 +8G offers 5850% better value. The Radeon R7 +8G is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-97% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-98% | $1229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.5+5850% | 1.0 |
| Codename | Tropo | Tahiti |
| Release | May 5 2015 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #737 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















