Radeon R7 +8G vs Radeon R9 M270X

AMD

Radeon R7 +8G

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 915 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M270X

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 +8G vs Radeon R9 M270X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 +8G vs Radeon R9 M270X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 +8G vs Radeon R9 M270X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 +8G

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $201 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 404.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M270X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M270X

2014

Why buy it

  • 0.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 410.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M270X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (1,204 vs 1,191), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 +8G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 +8G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $201 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 404.7% (24.3 vs 4.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M270X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 +8G vs Radeon R9 M270X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 +8G

The Radeon R7 +8G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M270X

The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 +8G scores 1,191 and the Radeon R9 M270X reaches 1,204 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 +8G is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M270X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M270X). Raw compute: 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M270X). Boost clocks: 915 MHz vs 775 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 +8GRadeon R9 M270X
G3D Mark Score
1,191
1,204+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.171 TFLOPS+18%
0.992 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
915 MHz+18%
775 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
160 KB
160 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 +8GRadeon R9 M270X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 +8G has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M270X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M270X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 +8G and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M270X.

FeatureRadeon R7 +8GRadeon R9 M270X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 +8G draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M270X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 +8G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R7 +8GRadeon R9 M270X
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
39.7+147%
16.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 +8G came in at $49, while the Radeon R9 M270X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R7 +8G was 80.4% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.3 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 4.8 (Radeon R9 M270X) — the Radeon R7 +8G offers 406.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 +8G (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R7 +8GRadeon R9 M270X
MSRP
$49-80%
$250
Performance per Dollar
24.3+406%
4.8
Codename
Tropo
Venus
Release
May 5 2015
March 21 2014
Ranking
#737
#819

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.