
Radeon R7 +8G vs Radeon R5 430 OEM

Radeon R7 +8G
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 430 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 +8G is positioned at rank 217 and the Radeon R5 430 OEM is on rank 1, so the Radeon R5 430 OEM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 +8G
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 430 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 430 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 +8G.
| Insight | Radeon R7 +8G | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 430 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 430 OEM holds the technical lead. Priced at $13 (vs $20), it costs 35% less, resulting in a 55% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 +8G | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($13) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 +8G and Radeon R5 430 OEM

Radeon R7 +8G
The Radeon R7 +8G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.

Radeon R5 430 OEM
The Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 30 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 780 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 +8G scores 1,191 and the Radeon R5 430 OEM reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 +8G is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 430 OEM uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 384 (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Raw compute: 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 0.599 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Boost clocks: 915 MHz vs 780 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,191 | 1,200 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.171 TFLOPS+95% | 0.599 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz+17% | 780 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+67% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 +8G draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 430 OEM's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 +8G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 250W (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 39.7+65% | 24.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 430 OEM costs 35% less ($7 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.5 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 92.3 (Radeon R5 430 OEM) — the Radeon R5 430 OEM offers 55.1% better value. The Radeon R5 430 OEM is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $13-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.5 | 92.3+55% |
| Codename | Tropo | Oland |
| Release | May 5 2015 | June 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #737 | #874 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















