
Radeon R7 +8G vs GeForce GT 640

Radeon R7 +8G
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 640
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 +8G is positioned at rank 217 and the GeForce GT 640 is on rank 107, so the GeForce GT 640 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 +8G
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 640
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 +8G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 640 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 +8G | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 +8G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 +8G holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 154.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 +8G | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+154.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 +8G and GeForce GT 640

Radeon R7 +8G
The Radeon R7 +8G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.

GeForce GT 640
The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 +8G scores 1,191 and the GeForce GT 640 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 +8G is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 640 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 384 (GeForce GT 640). Raw compute: 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640).
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,191+2% | 1,169 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.171 TFLOPS+69% | 0.6927 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+400% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 +8G comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 640 has 4 GB. The GeForce GT 640 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 640). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640).
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 +8G draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 640's 65W — a 73.7% difference. The Radeon R7 +8G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 300W (GeForce GT 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 60°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-54% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 168mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 60°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 39.7+121% | 18.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 +8G launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GT 640 launched at $99 and now averages $50. The Radeon R7 +8G costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.5 (Radeon R7 +8G) vs 23.4 (GeForce GT 640) — the Radeon R7 +8G offers 154.3% better value. The Radeon R7 +8G is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R7 +8G | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.5+154% | 23.4 |
| Codename | Tropo | GK107 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | June 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #737 | #837 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















