Radeon R7 A10-7800 vs Quadro K1000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is positioned at rank 488 and the Quadro K1000M is on rank 164, so the Quadro K1000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7800

#477

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2276%

#479

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

2063%

#480

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

2058%

#484

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1871%

#485

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1858%

#487

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

100%

#488

Radeon R7 A10-7800

MSRP: $155|Avg: $30

100%

#489

Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

100%

#490

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#491

Radeon HD 6450A

MSRP: $55|Avg: $15

99%

#492

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#493

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

98%

#494

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $35

95%

#495

Radeon HD 8180

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

94%

#497

Radeon R8 M535DX

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

94%

#499

Radeon R5 230

MSRP: $50|Avg: $25

93%

#500

GeForce 9300 GE

MSRP: $23|Avg: $25

93%

#501

Mobility Radeon HD 5450

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

92%

#502

Radeon HD 8650G + 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K1000M

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

94%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

93%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

92%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

89%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

88%

#149

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1954%

#164

Quadro K1000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

99%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

95%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

95%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

95%

#173

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $86

93%

#175

Radeon Pro 560

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

92%

#176

Radeon Pro 460

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2013). The Radeon R7 A10-7800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K1000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K1000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A10-7800.

Insight	Radeon R7 A10-7800	Quadro K1000M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K1000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 A10-7800 Benchmark Check

Quadro K1000M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-7800 and Quadro K1000M

Radeon R7 A10-7800

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.

Quadro K1000M

The Quadro K1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 756 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 scores 740 and the Quadro K1000M reaches 756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro K1000M uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 1,536 (Quadro K1000M). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K1000M).

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7800	Quadro K1000M
G3D Mark Score	740	756+2%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Kepler
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3840+150%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	35.87 TFLOPS+1414%	2.369 TFLOPS
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+88%	128
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7800	Quadro K1000M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1000M has 2 GB. The Quadro K1000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K1000M) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7800	Quadro K1000M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 draws 180W versus the Quadro K1000M's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro K1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 350W (Quadro K1000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.