CPU
GPU
Radeon R7 A10-7800
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is positioned at rank #488 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4167.3% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A10-7800.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4167.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4167.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 117% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 A10-7800.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+117%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-7800 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon R7 A10-7800
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 A10-7800 scores 740 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 4167.3%. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 240.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 740 | 31,578+4167% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 7680+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.87 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 2335 MHz | 2610 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 96+20% | 80 |
| TMUs | 240 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 7.5 MB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 60 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 12 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 45.2% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-37% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 110.8+2602% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 launched at $155 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 costs 94.9% less ($560 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.7 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 116.6% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $155-81% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-95% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.7 | 53.5+117% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | AD104 |
| Release | September 11 2024 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #131 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 A10-7800 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
