
Radeon R7 A10-7800 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

Radeon R7 A10-7800
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is positioned at rank 488 and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI is on rank 409, so the GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2009). The Radeon R7 A10-7800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $40 for the GeForce GTX 285M SLI, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 34.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+34.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-7800 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI

Radeon R7 A10-7800
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 scores 740 and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI reaches 734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 285M SLI uses G9x, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 740 | 734 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+1400% | 256 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 285M SLI's 150W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 150W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 4.9+20% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.7 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 18.4 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers 34.2% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $155 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-25% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.7+34% | 18.4 |
| Codename | Navi 32 | N10E-GTX |
| Release | September 11 2024 | March 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #131 | #753 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















