Radeon R7 A10-7800 vs Radeon HD 6670
Radeon R7 A10-7800
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is positioned at rank 488 and the Radeon HD 6670 is on rank 172, so the Radeon HD 6670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7800
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2010). The Radeon R7 A10-7800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $99 for the Radeon HD 6670, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 236.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+236.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-7800 and Radeon HD 6670
Radeon R7 A10-7800
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.
Radeon HD 6670
The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 scores 740 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 740+2% | 725 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+150% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.87 TFLOPS+1227% | 2.703 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2335 MHz+165% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+150% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+300% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 6670 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6670) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 draws 180W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-28% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1+41% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 launched at $155 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 6670 launched at $99 and now averages $99. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 costs 69.7% less ($69 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.7 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 7.3 (Radeon HD 6670) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers 238.4% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-7800 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $155 | $99-36% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-70% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.7+238% | 7.3 |
| Codename | Navi 32 | Cayman |
| Release | September 11 2024 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #131 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 A10-7800 and Radeon HD 6670
