Radeon R7 A10-8750
VS
FirePro W2100

Radeon R7 A10-8750 vs FirePro W2100

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8750

2016Core: 800 MHz
VS

FirePro W2100

2014Core: 630 MHzBoost: 680 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is positioned at rank 281 and the FirePro W2100 is on rank 190, so the FirePro W2100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-8750

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2121%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2038%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2014%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2011%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2006%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1995%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1970%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1963%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1944%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1939%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1916%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1912%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1877%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1876%
#266
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2339%
#281
Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
100%
#282
Radeon HD 6410D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
99%
#283
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
MSRP: $130|Avg: $130
97%
#285
Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
95%
#286
Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $83|Avg: $83
94%
#287
GeForce GT 220
MSRP: $69|Avg: $49
94%
#288
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
90%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
87%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
83%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
79%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
78%
#294
Radeon HD 8490
MSRP: $99|Avg: $35
78%
#295
Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W2100

#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
99%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
98%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
96%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
91%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
89%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
88%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
87%
#175
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2414%
#190
FirePro W2100
MSRP: $139|Avg: $30
100%
#191
CMP 30HX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $60
100%
#193
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
99%
#196
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
95%
#197
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
95%
#200
Radeon Pro Duo
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799
91%
#201
P102-100
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
90%
#203
Quadro FX 2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 A10-8750FirePro W2100
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A10-8750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 A10-8750FirePro W2100
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+0.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-8750 and FirePro W2100

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8750

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.

AMD

FirePro W2100

The FirePro W2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 680 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 26W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 851 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 scores 856 and the FirePro W2100 reaches 851 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro W2100 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 320 (FirePro W2100). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 0.4352 TFLOPS (FirePro W2100).

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8750FirePro W2100
G3D Mark Score
856
851
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+60%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8192 TFLOPS+88%
0.4352 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+60%
20
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8750FirePro W2100
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W2100 has 2 GB. The FirePro W2100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8750FirePro W2100
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 draws 55W versus the FirePro W2100's 26W — a 71.6% difference. The FirePro W2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 350W (FirePro W2100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8750FirePro W2100
TDP
55W
26W-53%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
15.6
32.7+110%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro W2100 launched at $139 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.5 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 28.4 (FirePro W2100) — the Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers 0.4% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8750FirePro W2100
MSRP
$250
$139-44%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$30
Performance per Dollar
28.5
28.4
Codename
Cape Verde
Oland
Release
July 6 2016
August 12 2014
Ranking
#667
#910