CPU
GPU
Radeon R7 A10-8750
Popular choices:
HD Graphics 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is positioned at rank #281 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-8750
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The HD Graphics 6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A10-8750 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The HD Graphics 6000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the HD Graphics 6000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 206% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A10-8750 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+206%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-8750 and HD Graphics 6000
Radeon R7 A10-8750
The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.
HD Graphics 6000
The HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 873 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A10-8750 scores 856 and the HD Graphics 6000 reaches 873 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the HD Graphics 6000 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 384 (HD Graphics 6000). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 6000).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-8750 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 856 | 873+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS+12% | 0.7296 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-8750 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 A10-8750 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 6000 has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-8750 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A10-8750 draws 55W versus the HD Graphics 6000's 15W — a 114.3% difference. The HD Graphics 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 1W (HD Graphics 6000). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-8750 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 15W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 15.6 | 58.2+273% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the HD Graphics 6000 launched at $0 and now averages $10. The HD Graphics 6000 costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.5 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 87.3 (HD Graphics 6000) — the HD Graphics 6000 offers 206.3% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A10-8750 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $10-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.5 | 87.3+206% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Broadwell GT3 |
| Release | July 6 2016 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #667 | #924 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 A10-8750 and HD Graphics 6000
