Radeon R7 A10-8750
VS
GRID M10-0B

Radeon R7 A10-8750 vs GRID M10-0B

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8750

2016Core: 800 MHz
VS

GRID M10-0B

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is positioned at rank 281 and the GRID M10-0B is on rank 403, so the Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-8750

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2121%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2038%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2014%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2011%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2006%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1995%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1970%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1963%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1944%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1939%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1916%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1912%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1877%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1876%
#266
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2339%
#281
Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
100%
#282
Radeon HD 6410D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
99%
#283
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
MSRP: $130|Avg: $130
97%
#285
Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
95%
#286
Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $83|Avg: $83
94%
#287
GeForce GT 220
MSRP: $69|Avg: $49
94%
#288
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
90%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
87%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
83%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
79%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
78%
#294
Radeon HD 8490
MSRP: $99|Avg: $35
78%
#295
Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0B

#388
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
67150%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
100%
#404
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
91%
#406
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
91%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
82%
#409
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
77%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
73%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
73%
#413
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
55%
#414
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
45%
#417
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
41%
#418
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
36%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M10-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A10-8750.

InsightRadeon R7 A10-8750GRID M10-0B
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A10-8750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $1,000), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3175.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 A10-8750GRID M10-0B
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+3175.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-8750 and GRID M10-0B

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8750

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-0B

The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 scores 856 and the GRID M10-0B reaches 871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M10-0B uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 640 (GRID M10-0B). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B).

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8750GRID M10-0B
G3D Mark Score
856
871+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8192 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS+104%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB
320 KB+150%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8750GRID M10-0B
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-0B) — the GRID M10-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8750GRID M10-0B
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 draws 55W versus the GRID M10-0B's 225W — a 121.4% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 350W (GRID M10-0B). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8750GRID M10-0B
TDP
55W-76%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
15.6+300%
3.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID M10-0B launched at $4000 and now averages $1000. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 costs 97% less ($970 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.5 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 0.9 (GRID M10-0B) — the Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers 3066.7% better value.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8750GRID M10-0B
MSRP
$250-94%
$4000
Avg Price (30d)
$30-97%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
28.5+3067%
0.9
Codename
Cape Verde
GM107
Release
July 6 2016
May 18 2016
Ranking
#667
#622