Radeon R7 A265
VS
FirePro V4900

Radeon R7 A265 vs FirePro V4900

AMD

Radeon R7 A265

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
VS

FirePro V4900

2011Core: 800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A265 is positioned at rank 427 and the FirePro V4900 is on rank 212, so the FirePro V4900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A265

#417
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1628%
#419
1476%
#420
1472%
#424
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1338%
#425
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1329%
#427
Radeon R7 A265
MSRP: $149|Avg: $149
100%
#428
Radeon R9 M470
MSRP: $350|Avg: $80
100%
#429
Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#431
Radeon R5 M430
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
98%
#432
Mobility Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
98%
#433
GeForce 810A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#434
GeForce GT 520MX
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
97%
#435
Radeon R5 330
MSRP: $81|Avg: $45
97%
#437
Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#438
Radeon R3
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#439
94%
#441
Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V4900

#91
RTX PRO 6000
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
99%
#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
97%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
97%
#197
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2925%
#212
FirePro V4900
MSRP: $200|Avg: $47
100%
#213
GRID K160Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
99%
#215
Quadro
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
99%
#216
FirePro W5000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
98%
#219
FirePro W7000 Adapter
MSRP: $899|Avg: $15
97%
#220
Quadro K420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#223
FirePro W7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $50
95%
#224
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $100
94%
#226
FirePro D500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
90%
#227
FirePro 3D V4800
MSRP: $189|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro V4900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A265.

InsightRadeon R7 A265FirePro V4900
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro V4900 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V4900 holds the technical lead. Priced at $47 (vs $149), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 221.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 A265FirePro V4900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+221.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($149)
More affordable ($47)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A265 and FirePro V4900

AMD

Radeon R7 A265

The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.

AMD

FirePro V4900

The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A265 scores 994 and the FirePro V4900 reaches 1,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A265 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro V4900 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A265) vs 480 (FirePro V4900). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900).

FeatureRadeon R7 A265FirePro V4900
G3D Mark Score
994
1,009+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6336 TFLOPS
0.768 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
96 KB+100%
48 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A265FirePro V4900
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A265 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V4900 has 1 GB. The FirePro V4900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon R7 A265FirePro V4900
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 A265) vs 11 (FirePro V4900). Vulkan: 1.1 vs None. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R7 A265FirePro V4900
DirectX
12 (11_1)+9%
11
Vulkan
1.1
None
OpenGL
4.5+2%
4.4
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A265) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 A265) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900).

FeatureRadeon R7 A265FirePro V4900
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A265 draws 30W versus the FirePro V4900's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A265) vs 350W (FirePro V4900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon R7 A265FirePro V4900
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
163mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75
75°C
Perf/Watt
33.1+145%
13.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A265 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $149, while the FirePro V4900 launched at $200 and now averages $47. The FirePro V4900 costs 68.5% less ($102 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) vs 21.5 (FirePro V4900) — the FirePro V4900 offers 220.9% better value. The Radeon R7 A265 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon R7 A265FirePro V4900
MSRP
$149-26%
$200
Avg Price (30d)
$149
$47-68%
Performance per Dollar
6.7
21.5+221%
Codename
Opal
Turks
Release
January 9 2014
November 1 2011
Ranking
#890
#882