CPU
GPU
Radeon R7 A265
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A265 is positioned at rank 427 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is on rank 524, so the Radeon R7 A265 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A265
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A265.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $149), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 273.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+273.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($149) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A265 and Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Radeon R7 A265
The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 997 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A265 scores 994 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual reaches 997 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A265) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 994 | 997 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A265 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A265) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.1+66% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A265 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $149, while the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual launched at $250 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual costs 73.2% less ($109 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) vs 24.9 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual) — the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual offers 271.6% better value. The Radeon R7 A265 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-40% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $149 | $40-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 24.9+272% |
| Codename | Opal | — |
| Release | January 9 2014 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #890 | #863 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 A265 and Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
