G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R9 M375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R9 M375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A265

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 100.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M375 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M375

2015

Why buy it

✅26.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
101.3% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M375 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (998 vs 994), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 A265 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A265 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 100.5% (6.7 vs 3.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M375 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R9 M375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 A265

The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.

Radeon R9 M375

The Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 998 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A265 scores 994 and the Radeon R9 M375 reaches 998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A265 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A265) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1015 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R9 M375
G3D Mark Score	994	998
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6336 TFLOPS	1.299 TFLOPS+105%
Boost Clock	825 MHz	1015 MHz+23%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	96 KB	160 KB+67%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R9 M375
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A265 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M375 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M375.

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R9 M375
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	64 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 A265) vs 11_1 (Radeon R9 M375). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R9 M375
DirectX	12 (11_1)+9%	11_1
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5+5%	4.3
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A265) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M375). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 A265) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 M375).

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R9 M375
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 3.0
Decoder	UVD 4.0	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A265 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M375's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A265) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R9 M375
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	33.1+149%	13.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 A265 came in at $149, while the Radeon R9 M375 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A265 was 50.3% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon R7 A265 offers 103% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M375 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R9 M375
MSRP	$149-50%	$300
Performance per Dollar	6.7+103%	3.3
Codename	Opal	Tropo
Release	January 9 2014	May 5 2015
Ranking	#890	#889

Search Radeon R7 A265 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.