FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 A265

FirePro V4900

2011Core: 800 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A265

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 A265 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 A265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V4900

2011

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 34.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A265

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 32.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro V4900 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (1,009 vs 994), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V4900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A265 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 32.2% (6.7 vs 5.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A265 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V4900 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 A265 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V4900

The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A265

The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the Radeon R7 A265 reaches 994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 A265 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A265). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265).

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon R7 A265
G3D Mark Score
1,009+2%
994
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+25%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS+21%
0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
48 KB
96 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon R7 A265
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V4900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A265 carries 512 MB. FirePro V4900 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V4900 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265.

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon R7 A265
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 A265). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon R7 A265
DirectX
11
12 (11_1)+9%
Vulkan
None
1.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.5+2%
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A265). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 A265).

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon R7 A265
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3.1
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 A265's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A265). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon R7 A265
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
163mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
75
Perf/Watt
13.5
33.1+145%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V4900 came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 A265 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A265 was 25.5% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (FirePro V4900) vs 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) — the Radeon R7 A265 offers 34% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A265 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro V4900Radeon R7 A265
MSRP
$200
$149-26%
Performance per Dollar
5.0
6.7+34%
Codename
Turks
Opal
Release
November 1 2011
January 9 2014
Ranking
#882
#890

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.