
FirePro V4900

Radeon R7 A265
FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 A265 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 A265 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 A265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V4900
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌34.2% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 A265
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 A265 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V4900
The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

Radeon R7 A265
The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V4900 scores 1,009 and the Radeon R7 A265 reaches 994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V4900 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 A265 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (FirePro V4900) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A265). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,009+2% | 994 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+21% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 96 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V4900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A265 carries 512 MB. FirePro V4900 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V4900 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro V4900) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 A265). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5+2% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A265). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 A265).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V4900 draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 A265's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V4900) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A265). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 163mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 33.1+145% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V4900 came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 A265 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A265 was 25.5% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (FirePro V4900) vs 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) — the Radeon R7 A265 offers 34% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A265 (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V4900 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $149-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0 | 6.7+34% |
| Codename | Turks | Opal |
| Release | November 1 2011 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #882 | #890 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















