
FirePro M4150

Radeon R7 A265
FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 A265 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 A265 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 A265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4150
2013Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌34.2% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 A265
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 A265 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4150
The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Radeon R7 A265
The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon R7 A265 reaches 994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A265 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A265). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,011+2% | 994 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 0.6336 TFLOPS+15% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A265 carries 512 MB. FirePro M4150 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 A265). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6+200% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A265). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4150) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 A265).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 A265's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A265). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 33.1+394% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M4150 came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 A265 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A265 was 25.5% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (FirePro M4150) vs 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) — the Radeon R7 A265 offers 31.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A265 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $149-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 6.7+31% |
| Codename | Opal | Opal |
| Release | October 16 2013 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #879 | #890 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















