Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R7 A265

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R7 A265 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R7 A265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4800

2008

Why buy it

✅52.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1107.4% HIGHER MSRP
$1,799 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A265

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,650 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1094.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 4800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 52.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (1,005 vs 994), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 4800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A265 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,650 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1094.2% (6.7 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A265 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 4800 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R7 A265 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4800

The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon R7 A265

The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4800 scores 1,005 and the Radeon R7 A265 reaches 994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7 A265 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A265). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265).

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon R7 A265
G3D Mark Score	1,005+1%	994
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.6336 TFLOPS+37%
ROPs	24+200%	8
TMUs	64+167%	24
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon R7 A265
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A265 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 4800 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A265) — the Radeon R7 A265 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon R7 A265
VRAM Capacity	1.5 GB+200%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4800 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 A265's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4800) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A265). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon R7 A265
TDP	150W	30W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	6.7	33.1+394%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 4800 came in at $1799, while the Radeon R7 A265 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A265 was 91.7% cheaper ($1650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) — the Radeon R7 A265 offers 1016.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A265 (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon R7 A265
MSRP	$1799	$149-92%
Performance per Dollar	0.6	6.7+1017%
Codename	GT200B	Opal
Release	November 11 2008	January 9 2014
Ranking	#884	#890

Search Quadro FX 4800 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A265 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.