Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M375

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4800

2008Core: 602 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M375

2015Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1015 MHz

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M375 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4800

2008

Why buy it

  • 20.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 499.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,799 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M375

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,499 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 495.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 4800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (1,005 vs 998), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 4800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M375 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,499 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $1,799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 495.5% (3.3 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M375 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 4800 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4800

The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.

AMD

Radeon R9 M375

The Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 998 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4800 scores 1,005 and the Radeon R9 M375 reaches 998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375).

FeatureQuadro FX 4800Radeon R9 M375
G3D Mark Score
1,005
998
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
640+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4623 TFLOPS
1.299 TFLOPS+181%
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
64+60%
40
L2 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 4800Radeon R9 M375
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M375 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M375. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon R9 M375 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 4800Radeon R9 M375
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB
4 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4800 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M375's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4800) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadro FX 4800Radeon R9 M375
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
6.7
13.3+99%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 4800 came in at $1799, while the Radeon R9 M375 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M375 was 83.3% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon R9 M375 offers 450% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M375 (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 4800Radeon R9 M375
MSRP
$1799
$300-83%
Performance per Dollar
0.6
3.3+450%
Codename
GT200B
Tropo
Release
November 11 2008
May 5 2015
Ranking
#884
#889

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.