
Quadro FX 4800

Radeon R9 M375
Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M375 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M375 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 4800
2008Why buy it
- ✅20.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌499.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,799 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M375
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,499 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 495.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M375 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4800
The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon R9 M375
The Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 998 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 4800 scores 1,005 and the Radeon R9 M375 reaches 998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,005 | 998 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 640+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 1.299 TFLOPS+181% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 4800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M375 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M375. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon R9 M375 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | 4 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 4800 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M375's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4800) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 13.3+99% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 4800 came in at $1799, while the Radeon R9 M375 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M375 was 83.3% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon R9 M375 offers 450% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M375 (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1799 | $300-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.6 | 3.3+450% |
| Codename | GT200B | Tropo |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #884 | #889 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














