Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M375
Quadro FX 4800
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 4800 is positioned at rank 379 and the Radeon R9 M375 is on rank 565, so the Quadro FX 4800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4800
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M375
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R9 M375 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The Radeon R9 M375 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 4800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 4800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M375 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 4800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 4800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $300), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 277.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+277.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M375
Quadro FX 4800
The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Radeon R9 M375
The Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 998 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 4800 scores 1,005 and the Radeon R9 M375 reaches 998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,005 | 998 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 640+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 1.299 TFLOPS+181% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 4800 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M375 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon R9 M375 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | 4 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 4800 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M375's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4800) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 13.3+99% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 4800 launched at $1799 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Radeon R9 M375 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Quadro FX 4800 costs 73.3% less ($220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.6 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M375) — the Quadro FX 4800 offers 281.8% better value. The Radeon R9 M375 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1799 | $300-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-73% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6+282% | 3.3 |
| Codename | GT200B | Tropo |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #884 | #889 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M375
